Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Marilouise Van Zyl vs Amanda Carolina Nava Elkin Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Zyl vs Elkin analysis and find out who is favored!
Marilouise Van Zyl vs Amanda Carolina Nava Elkin Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Zyl 1 - 0 Elkin
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Zyl has won 43.88% of points on their second serve, while Elkin has won 40.59%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Zyl, in recent form, has won 55.79% of their opponent's second serve points, while Elkin has won 52.4%. The same stats for first serve returns are 36.84% and 33.87% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Zyl has saved 47.5% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Elkin has saved 46.11% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Zyl has won 55.56% of matches played (W/L 5/ 4), with Elkin winning 36.36% (W/L 16/ 28) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Zyl has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 36% (W/L 5/ 9), and worse career win % on Hard, winning 36% (W/L 5/ 9). Elkin has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 42% (W/L 16/ 22), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 0% (W/L 0/ 2).
- Player level: In the last year, Zyl has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 57.14% of matches (W/L 4/ 3), where as Elkin has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 39.47% of matches (W/L 15/ 23). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Zyl winning 1 times and Elkin being victorious 0 times. They have played 3 sets in total, with Zyl winning 2 and Elkin winning 1. The last match between Zyl and Elkin was at the W50 Pretoria, 27-02-2024, First, Hard with Marilouise Van Zyl getting the victory 5-7 6-4 6-4.
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 2:46:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Zyl and Elkin have played a deciding set 1 times, with Zyl winning 1 times and Elkin 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Zyl winning 0, and Elkin 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Zyl has played against opponents with an average rank of 30.89 while Elkin has played against players with an average rank of 74.5.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Zyl has won 67% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Elkin has won 50% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Zyl has converted 39.39% of breakpoint opportunities, and Elkin has converted 53.7% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
N/A
Rank
High
18
Age
Plays
1
Total0
1
Hard0
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
N/A
Rank
High
25
Age
Plays
L
L
W
L
W
L
W
W
W
L
Form
L
W
W
L
W
L
L
W
L
L
36% (5-9)
Career Total W/L
36% (26-46)
63% (5-3)
YTD W/L
41% (9-13)
$0
Career Prize Money
$0
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
| stats | Marilouise Van Zyl | Amanda Carolina Nava Elkin |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
| Sets Won | 2 | 1 |
| Games Won | 17 | 15 |
| Aces (Total) | 3 | 2 |
| DFs (Total) | 3 | 5 |
| Avg Match Time | 2:46:0 | 2:46:0 |
| 1st Serve % | 66% (67/102) | 60% (67/111) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 66% (44/67) | 55% (37/67) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 43% (15/35) | 45% (20/44) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 78% (7/9) | 60% (6/10) |
| Return Points W% | 49% (54/111) | 42% (43/102) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| 1st set W, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (0/0) | 100% (1/1) |
| 1st set L, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 5-7 6-4 6-4 |
Stats 
Marilouise Van Zyl
Player
Amanda Carolina Nava Elkin
66%
(
67 of
102)
1st Serve %
60%
(
67 of
111)
3
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
5
66%
(
44 of
67)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
37 of
67)
43%
(
15 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
20 of
44)
78%
(
7 of
9)
Break Points Won
60%
(
6 of
10)
42%
(
43 of
102)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
54 of
111)
113
Total Points Won
100
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Marilouise Van Zyl | Amanda Carolina Nava Elkin |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 63% (5/3) | 41% (9/13) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 58% (11/8) | 43% (20/27) |
| Games Win/Loss | 53% (99/87) | 47% (179/201) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 63% (5/3) | 50% (4/4) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 42% (5/7) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/2) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.07 | 0.11 |
| Aces Total | 6 | 20 |
| DFs per game | 0.07 | 0.62 |
| DFs Total | 6 | 114 |
| Avg Match Time | 1st Match | 1:12:5 |
| Avg Opp Rank | 34.75 | 59.23 |
| 1st Serve % | 66% (190/288) | 57% (595/1053) |
| 1st Serve W% | 57% (108/190) | 60% (356/595) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 44% (43/98) | 41% (190/458) |
| BPs Won% Total | 39% (13/33) | 54% (53/98) |
| Return Pts W% | 43% (123/285) | 42% (410/981) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 50% (1/1) | 45% (9/11) |
| Futures W/L | 67% (4/2) | 0% (0/2) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 63% (5/8) | 41% (9/22) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Deciding Set W% | 67% (2/3) | 33% (1/3) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (4/4) | 90% (10/9) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (4/0) | 10% (10/1) |
| 1st set L, W | 25% (4/1) | 0% (12/0) |
Marilouise Van Zyl Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Anna Kubareva
Player
Marilouise Van Zyl
73%
(
37 of
51)
1st Serve %
63%
(
37 of
59)
2
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
1
73%
(
27 of
37)
1st Serve Won
49%
(
18 of
37)
57%
(
8 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
10 of
22)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
31%
(
16 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
31 of
59)
66
Total Points Won
44
|
6-1 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Marilouise Van Zyl
Player
Unknown Player
69%
(
49 of
71)
1st Serve %
74%
(
57 of
77)
-
Aces
-
1
Double Faults
3
55%
(
27 of
49)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
31 of
57)
45%
(
10 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
7 of
20)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
50%
(
5 of
10)
48%
(
34 of
71)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
39 of
77)
76
Total Points Won
72
|
7-5 3-6 10-7 | H2H | ||
| Q2 | 6-0 6-1 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 6-1 7-6(3) | H2H | |||
| Q2 | 6-3 3-6 10-7 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 6-3 6-0 | H2H | |||
| R2 |
Stats
Gabriela Andrea Knutson
Player
Marilouise Van Zyl
63%
(
29 of
46)
1st Serve %
66%
(
37 of
56)
4
Aces
3
4
Double Faults
1
86%
(
25 of
29)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
19 of
37)
41%
(
7 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
8 of
19)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
11%
(
1 of
9)
30%
(
14 of
46)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
29 of
56)
61
Total Points Won
41
|
6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Marilouise Van Zyl
Player
Amanda Carolina Nava Elkin
66%
(
67 of
102)
1st Serve %
60%
(
67 of
111)
3
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
5
66%
(
44 of
67)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
37 of
67)
43%
(
15 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
20 of
44)
78%
(
7 of
9)
Break Points Won
60%
(
6 of
10)
42%
(
43 of
102)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
54 of
111)
113
Total Points Won
100
|
5-7 6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 | 6-4 6-1 | H2H | |||
| R1 |
Stats
Alice Tubello
Player
Marilouise Van Zyl
42%
(
18 of
43)
1st Serve %
56%
(
24 of
43)
0
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
8
83%
(
15 of
18)
1st Serve Won
46%
(
11 of
24)
64%
(
16 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
6 of
19)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
28%
(
12 of
43)
Rtn Points Won
60%
(
26 of
43)
57
Total Points Won
29
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
view more
Amanda Carolina Nava Elkin Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Zoe Hitt
Player
Amanda Carolina Nava Elkin
61%
(
39 of
64)
1st Serve %
60%
(
27 of
45)
0
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
3
64%
(
25 of
39)
1st Serve Won
41%
(
11 of
27)
52%
(
13 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
9 of
18)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
41%
(
26 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
25 of
45)
63
Total Points Won
46
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Paris Corley
Player
Amanda Carolina Nava Elkin
66%
(
33 of
50)
1st Serve %
50%
(
21 of
42)
1
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
8
55%
(
18 of
33)
1st Serve Won
29%
(
6 of
21)
65%
(
11 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
9 of
21)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
42%
(
21 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
64%
(
27 of
42)
56
Total Points Won
36
|
6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Amanda Carolina Nava Elkin
Player
Sabastiani Leon
52%
(
36 of
69)
1st Serve %
70%
(
32 of
46)
1
Aces
0
9
Double Faults
2
64%
(
23 of
36)
1st Serve Won
44%
(
14 of
32)
48%
(
16 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
64%
(
9 of
14)
100%
(
4 of
4)
Break Points Won
18%
(
2 of
11)
43%
(
30 of
69)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
23 of
46)
62
Total Points Won
53
|
7-5 3-1 ret. | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Jessica Hinojosa Gomez
Player
Amanda Carolina Nava Elkin
41%
(
13 of
32)
1st Serve %
38%
(
17 of
45)
2
Aces
1
7
Double Faults
8
77%
(
10 of
13)
1st Serve Won
35%
(
6 of
17)
63%
(
12 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
8 of
28)
50%
(
7 of
14)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
31%
(
10 of
32)
Rtn Points Won
69%
(
31 of
45)
53
Total Points Won
24
|
6-1 6-0 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Sarah Victoria Majesty Nita
Player
Amanda Carolina Nava Elkin
46%
(
32 of
69)
1st Serve %
42%
(
25 of
59)
-
Aces
-
10
Double Faults
13
59%
(
19 of
32)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
16 of
25)
43%
(
16 of
37)
2nd Serve Won
24%
(
8 of
34)
88%
(
7 of
8)
Break Points Won
42%
(
5 of
12)
49%
(
34 of
69)
Rtn Points Won
59%
(
35 of
59)
70
Total Points Won
58
|
7-5 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 | 6-0 6-0 | H2H | |||
| R1 |
Stats
Cadence Brace
Player
Amanda Carolina Nava Elkin
50%
(
20 of
40)
1st Serve %
38%
(
23 of
60)
2
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
7
95%
(
19 of
20)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
12 of
23)
60%
(
12 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
16 of
37)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
23%
(
9 of
40)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
32 of
60)
63
Total Points Won
37
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Amanda Carolina Nava Elkin
Player
Katja Markus
60%
(
29 of
48)
1st Serve %
39%
(
17 of
44)
2
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
4
69%
(
20 of
29)
1st Serve Won
29%
(
5 of
17)
37%
(
7 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
9 of
27)
54%
(
7 of
13)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
44%
(
21 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
68%
(
30 of
44)
57
Total Points Won
35
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q1 | 6-3 6-2 | H2H | |||
| QF |
Stats
Esther Vyrlan
Player
Amanda Carolina Nava Elkin
64%
(
36 of
56)
1st Serve %
54%
(
27 of
50)
5
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
6
81%
(
29 of
36)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
16 of
27)
35%
(
7 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
26%
(
6 of
23)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
36%
(
20 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
28 of
50)
64
Total Points Won
42
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
view more
Zyl Vs Elkin Prediction H2H Images To Share
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
